Marshallese vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Marshallese
Chinese
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 79.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 24.0% | 64.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.0% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 73.9% | 87.3% |
| Median | 77.3% | 86.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.5% | 83.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.9% | 90.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Israel (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |