Immigrants from Thailand vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,184,980 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 41.3 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $48,093, a difference of 10.0%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $38,560, a difference of 9.7%), and median family income ($99,840 compared to $91,087, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $52,626, a difference of 3.9%), median household income ($83,327 compared to $78,803, a difference of 5.7%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.87%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.8%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.1%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Central American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%).