Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,167,864 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 56.0 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 37.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $53,766, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $89,394, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,598 compared to $45,816, a difference of 0.48%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $41,478, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $88,687, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.85%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 33.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.95%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 209.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 90.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 28.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.6%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, under 1 year (64.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.35%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.44%).