Immigrants from Thailand vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,686,392 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 47.2 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,289 compared to $34,195, a difference of 23.7%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $44,010, a difference of 20.2%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $38,907, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $84,085, a difference of 8.6%), median household income ($83,327 compared to $76,670, a difference of 8.7%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and family households (63.8% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.1%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 56.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.69%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 73.5%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 61.5%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.95%).