Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,073,859 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 71.3 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,289 compared to $48,844, a difference of 15.5%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $59,527, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $51,817, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $41,277, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $49,722, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.5%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.34%).