Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Ukraine Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,932,563 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Ukraine. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 94.4 Immigrants from Ukraine.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,289 compared to $48,134, a difference of 13.8%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $59,820, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $102,664, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $61,163, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and median household income ($83,327 compared to $91,124, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 56.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.8%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).