Egyptian vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,074,550 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 41.2 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $45,758, a difference of 43.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,256 compared to $78,836, a difference of 42.4%), and median family income ($114,119 compared to $81,233, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $50,204, a difference of 8.5%), median female earnings ($43,305 compared to $36,857, a difference of 17.5%), and median earnings ($51,701 compared to $41,554, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 120.4%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 77.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.8%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.4%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 60.6%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 42.0%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (65.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 164.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 87.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 82.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 63.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 82.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 71.1%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 64.6%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.0%).