Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,897,937 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 49.6 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 72.1%), median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $41,685, a difference of 19.8%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $41,478, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $50,795, a difference of 0.16%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $92,419, a difference of 0.72%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $53,766, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 49.5%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.96%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 49.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 60.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.2%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 167.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 111.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 26.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 63.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 90.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 79.1%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (91.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and 11th grade (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 101.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.96%).