Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,553,146 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.9%), householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $53,163, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $41,685, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $50,795, a difference of 0.77%), median family income ($93,748 compared to $92,419, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $89,394, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 32.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.40%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 141.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 58.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 24.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 52.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.7%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.61%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%).