Immigrants from Micronesia vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,072,919 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 41.8 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 35.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $51,463, a difference of 18.5%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $40,299, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,574 compared to $75,647, a difference of 0.10%), median family income ($90,345 compared to $88,987, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,844, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 0.26%), single female poverty (23.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 38.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.010%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 194.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 119.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 28.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 55.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.4%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.8% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.69%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.81%).