Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Births to Unmarried Women

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Chickasaw Luxembourgers

COMPARE

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Luxembourger

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian LumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Births to Unmarried Women

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or SeparatedBirths to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Births to Unmarried Women Comparison

Chickasaw

Luxembourgers

Tragic

Exceptional

36.3%

BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN

0.2/ 100

METRIC RATING

255th/ 347

METRIC RANK

29.4%

BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN

95.2/ 100

METRIC RATING

100th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,038,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 23.3%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Luxembourger
Minimum	5.6%	5.1%
Maximum	100.0%	83.6%
Range	94.4%	78.5%
Mean	53.6%	34.7%
Median	47.0%	34.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	34.0%	25.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	70.0%	37.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	36.0%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	25.5%	16.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	25.3%	16.4%

Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.6 /100 \| #248	Tragic 35.5%
Bermudans	0.6 /100 \| #249	Tragic 35.5%
Mexican American Indians	0.4 /100 \| #250	Tragic 35.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 36.0%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 36.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	0.2 /100 \| #253	Tragic 36.2%
Potawatomi	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 36.2%
Chickasaw	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 36.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 36.3%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 36.3%
Americans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 36.4%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 36.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 36.5%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 36.5%
French American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 36.6%

Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Denmark (29.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Syria (29.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from South Africa (29.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Norwegian (29.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Estonians	96.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 29.2%
Ukrainians	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 29.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	96.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 29.3%
Norwegians	95.8 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 29.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.7 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 29.3%
Immigrants \| Syria	95.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 29.4%
Luxembourgers	95.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	94.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 29.5%
Australians	94.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 29.5%
Lebanese	94.4 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 29.5%
Lithuanians	94.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 29.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	94.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 29.6%
Swedes	93.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 29.6%
Immigrants \| Brazil	93.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 29.6%