Crow vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,372,951 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.939. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.335% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 335.2 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $42,035, a difference of 32.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $96,066, a difference of 29.4%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $82,272, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,611, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,049, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $45,593, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 84.5%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 80.6%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 226.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 224.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 215.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.0%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.25, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.4%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.22%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%).