Immigrants from China vs Belgian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,809,083 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Belgians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Belgians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $94,262, a difference of 27.1%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $84,008, a difference of 25.4%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,951, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,915, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,113, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 39.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.82%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 89.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.8%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.91%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).