Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,370,793 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 59.1 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $41,365, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $89,444, a difference of 25.5%), and median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $52,681, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $53,384, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $59,824, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 33.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 53.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 64.2%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.55%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.7%).