Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,829,616 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 45.5 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 34.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $53,974, a difference of 29.3%), and median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $51,793, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $52,986, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $40,340, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $94,867, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 65.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 50.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in currently married (48.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 8.3%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.22%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.7%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 42.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.1%).