Icelander vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,996,649 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.977. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.254% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 254.5 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.2%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $48,137, a difference of 15.1%), and per capita income ($44,987 compared to $39,108, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $50,627, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $36,459, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $65,874, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.3%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.47%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.6%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.38, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.7%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.35%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%).