Fijian vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,227,591 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.604. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 78.0 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $72,135, a difference of 58.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $121,778, a difference of 52.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $129,560, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $59,187, a difference of 18.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $72,099, a difference of 27.0%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 61.7%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 60.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.57%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 145.0%), master's degree (10.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 111.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 110.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 54.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.4%).