Fijian vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,893,529 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.334% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 334.4 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 13.7%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $34,559, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $53,897, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $74,399, a difference of 0.26%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $49,989, a difference of 0.29%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $80,427, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.92%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.9%), associate's degree (37.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.69%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.80%).