Fijian vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,688,290 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 76.4 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $65,874, a difference of 16.0%), median family income ($87,387 compared to $95,293, a difference of 9.0%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $39,108, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,627, a difference of 0.99%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $36,459, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.40%), male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 44.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.38, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 27.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.3%).