Fijian vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,948,842 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.902. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.846% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 845.8 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.7%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $52,170, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $94,448, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $57,426, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $49,348, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $37,024, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.52%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.8%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.0%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.4%).