Immigrants from West Indies vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,714,989 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Immigrant from West Indies communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from West Indies within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.323% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from West Indies corresponds to an increase of 323.2 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 24.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,927 compared to $62,922, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,164 compared to $97,417, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,441 compared to $39,513, a difference of 0.18%), median earnings ($43,989 compared to $45,468, a difference of 3.4%), and median male earnings ($49,271 compared to $52,409, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 69.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.50%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 150.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.9%), births to unmarried women (38.6% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.6% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 104.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (79.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (43.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and college, under 1 year (60.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.14%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from West Indies and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 92.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%).