Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,103,908 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.654% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 653.6 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 48.8%), per capita income ($52,217 compared to $40,742, a difference of 28.2%), and median family income ($115,847 compared to $92,513, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $40,773, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $55,726, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $45,204, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 68.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 44.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.80%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 45.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 31.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.8%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.88%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 157.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 80.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 25.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 55.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 68.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 79.9%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.3%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.5%).