Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,913,920 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 20.5 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 34.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $90,186, a difference of 11.0%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $92,513, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,928 compared to $45,204, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $89,586, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $40,773, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 38.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.70%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.40, a difference of 4.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 187.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 91.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 27.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 58.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 75.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.87%), 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 26.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.57%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.96%).