Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Shoshone

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Shoshone Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,154,080 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.164% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 164.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Shoshone Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $38,028, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $91,385, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $48,749, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($47,930 compared to $50,298, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,062 compared to $86,736, a difference of 5.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,072
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,872
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,660
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,932
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,930
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,677
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,720
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,062
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,588
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,681
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Exceptional
22.8%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 39.2%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.97%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.9%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 79.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 66.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.6%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.7%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.4%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.8%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.3%
Tragic
82.0%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 0.74%), married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Poor
32.9%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Fair
6.2%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.90%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.3%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Poor
1.7%

Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 43.7%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.1%), and male disability (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricShoshoneImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.9%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%