Puerto Rican vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,928,196 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($42,550 compared to $57,114, a difference of 34.2%), median family income ($70,423 compared to $94,472, a difference of 34.2%), and median household income ($59,197 compared to $78,682, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $38,028, a difference of 20.5%), wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $48,749, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 109.8%), receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 101.7%), and family poverty (20.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 93.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 38.2%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 45.7%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (13.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 84.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (16.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 83.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 38.9%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.38%), family households (64.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (95.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and 4th grade (96.7% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 77.6%), self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.5%).