Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,036,831 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $58,353, a difference of 53.3%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $134,818, a difference of 52.7%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $71,348, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $56,835, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $47,986, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 107.7%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 73.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.2%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.8%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 48.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.16, a difference of 6.8%), and family households (67.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 170.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 107.6%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.74%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.1%).