Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Ukraine Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,476,502 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.631. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Immigrants from Ukraine. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 30.3 Immigrants from Ukraine.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $48,134, a difference of 26.5%), median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $59,820, a difference of 26.0%), and median family income ($88,267 compared to $109,645, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $55,447, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $61,163, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 39.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), family households (67.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.5%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.8%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.2%).