Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,778,851 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,838 compared to $39,870, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $57,919, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $38,528, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $91,624, a difference of 0.18%), median household income ($84,299 compared to $83,395, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $96,834, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.080%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.6%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.35, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.53%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.9%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.2%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.1%).