Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chinese
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
9.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,843,710 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 36.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 25.9% |
| Range | 55.7% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 10.8% |
| Median | 13.9% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.49%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |