Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,472,905 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $39,608, a difference of 21.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $52,121, a difference of 19.7%), and median family income ($109,418 compared to $95,402, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.60%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $52,621, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $38,573, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 51.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 33.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.8%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 69.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 9.9%).