Lithuanian vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Cypriots

Excellent
Excellent
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,652,636 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 190.8 Cypriots.
Lithuanian Integration in Cypriot Communities

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $54,899, a difference of 11.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $116,364, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $127,064, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $52,209, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $54,589, a difference of 7.1%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricLithuanianCypriot
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
27.3%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.15%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianCypriot
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
8.9%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianCypriot
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.6%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianCypriot
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
27.0%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 85.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 21.0%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Tragic
5.0%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Lithuanian vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Lithuanian vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianCypriot
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%