Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,475,129 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,669 compared to $49,302, a difference of 21.2%), median family income ($96,231 compared to $112,151, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $102,407, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $53,307, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $41,319, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.5%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and master's degree (13.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.5%).