Immigrants from India vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,993,584 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to an increase of 3.6 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($132,488 compared to $82,736, a difference of 60.1%), median male earnings ($74,207 compared to $47,066, a difference of 57.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,238 compared to $78,911, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $47,448, a difference of 26.3%), median female earnings ($48,292 compared to $36,424, a difference of 32.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $52,072, a difference of 39.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 124.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (10.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 103.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (10.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 102.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 29.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and single mother poverty (23.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.4%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 72.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 69.7%), and divorced or separated (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%), family households (67.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 88.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.4%), master's degree (22.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 70.6%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 55.0%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and ambulatory disability (4.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 8.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 17.5%).