Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,630,938 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.872% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 872.0 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 34.7%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $33,664, a difference of 21.5%), and per capita income ($41,476 compared to $34,559, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $53,897, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $49,989, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $86,816, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 19.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.4%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.17%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.48, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 250.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 117.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 85.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.4%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.5%).