Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,594,833 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.786. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.328% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 327.6 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $76,910, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $83,177, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $35,027, a difference of 10.5%), per capita income ($41,678 compared to $37,193, a difference of 12.1%), and median earnings ($45,933 compared to $39,861, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 37.6%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.0%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.71%), family households (66.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%).