Maltese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Chickasaw
11.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,992,298 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 44.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 47.8% | 67.9% |
| Range | 44.8% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 25.6% |
| Median | 10.9% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Asian (11.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |