Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,347,008 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $65,715, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,863 compared to $109,446, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $51,817, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($40,340 compared to $41,277, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $102,020, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 56.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.91%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.5%), female unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.2%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 94.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 80.9%), self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.3%).