Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,974,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $60,096, a difference of 11.3%), median family income ($97,605 compared to $102,823, a difference of 5.3%), and median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $53,715, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,552 compared to $44,509, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $93,466, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($83,555 compared to $85,025, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 37.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 28.5%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 44.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 33.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.4%), births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (63.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.8%), no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 88.1%), disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.3%).