Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,720,668 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Immigrants from Syria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $56,830, a difference of 22.9%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $106,118, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $104,858, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,494, a difference of 0.090%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,499, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $62,303, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.1%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%).