Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,696,103 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Immigrants from Syria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.3%), per capita income ($40,434 compared to $45,218, a difference of 11.8%), and median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $56,830, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $51,494, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $40,499, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $96,789, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.38%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.9%).