Osage vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Hong Kong
5.3%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
65.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,677,196 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,631,392 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 13.8% |
Range | 17.6% | 11.8% |
Mean | 6.9% | 5.3% |
Median | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Oceania (5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Peru (5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Malaysian (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Poland (5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Iraq (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), South American (5.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Morocco (5.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Norway | 71.0 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 70.6 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 65.9 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 65.7 /100 | #163 | Good 5.2% |
Afghans | 62.0 /100 | #164 | Good 5.3% |
South Americans | 60.6 /100 | #165 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 60.2 /100 | #166 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 57.7 /100 | #168 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Congo | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 54.1 /100 | #170 | Average 5.3% |
Peruvians | 51.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Russia | 50.7 /100 | #173 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 48.1 /100 | #175 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 44.6 /100 | #177 | Average 5.3% |
Osage | 42.5 /100 | #178 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 40.8 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
Malaysians | 39.6 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |