Immigrants from Western Europe vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,095,417 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Western Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.922. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.768% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Europe corresponds to a decrease of 767.8 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,065 compared to $40,669, a difference of 23.1%), median family income ($112,688 compared to $96,231, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,654 compared to $88,301, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,957 compared to $49,348, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,933 compared to $57,426, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 46.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and master's degree (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 7.8%).