Immigrants from Iraq vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,352,472 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to a decrease of 51.5 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,824 compared to $48,535, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,201 compared to $82,513, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,864 compared to $36,414, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,384 compared to $50,757, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($44,988 compared to $41,119, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 64.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 46.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 162.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 47.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 38.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.4%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%).