Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,757,617 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.0%), median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $37,970, a difference of 10.3%), and per capita income ($35,688 compared to $38,165, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,515 compared to $80,863, a difference of 0.43%), median household income ($73,823 compared to $74,896, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,006 compared to $87,739, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 12.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.8%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), male disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%).