Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,414,075 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $57,114, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $48,749, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $91,385, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,935 compared to $39,827, a difference of 0.27%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,758 compared to $86,736, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($44,640 compared to $43,998, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 63.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.21%), male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 25.7%), single mother households (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 5.8%).