Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cajun
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cajuns

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Poor
Fair
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Cajun Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,248,216 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to a decrease of 48.4 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Cajun Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 48.3%), median female earnings ($34,034 compared to $38,028, a difference of 11.7%), and median household income ($70,605 compared to $78,682, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $50,298, a difference of 4.0%), median earnings ($42,189 compared to $43,998, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,393 compared to $86,736, a difference of 5.3%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,527
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,157
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,605
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,189
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,325
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,034
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,338
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,393
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,015
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,397
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
33.9%
Exceptional
22.8%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 45.3%), single father poverty (23.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and single female poverty (30.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.6%), receiving food stamps (13.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
19.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 61.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%), female unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.8%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.1%
Tragic
82.0%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 24.6%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.97%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Excellent
64.8%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.4%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Poor
32.9%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.7%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
6.2%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 82.8%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and bachelor's degree (29.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.26%), high school diploma (87.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and ged/equivalency (82.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.73%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.1%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.3%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.4%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.1%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Cajun vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricCajunImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
14.6%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.2%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.9%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.7%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.8%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%