Spanish American vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,440,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Spanish American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish Americans corresponds to an increase of 145.5 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 7.8%), median family income ($90,322 compared to $94,472, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($36,391 compared to $38,028, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,021 compared to $57,114, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($39,012 compared to $39,827, a difference of 2.1%), and median male earnings ($49,008 compared to $50,298, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.8%), bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and associate's degree (41.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.16%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and college, 1 year or more (56.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.5%).