Spanish American vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,457,483 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Spanish American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.340% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish Americans corresponds to a decrease of 339.6 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income over 65 years ($57,021 compared to $48,535, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($90,322 compared to $83,319, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,391 compared to $36,414, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($42,316 compared to $41,119, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,722 compared to $80,326, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 40.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), single mother poverty (32.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 116.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 79.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 58.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%).