Immigrants from Norway vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,525,470 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.614% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 613.7 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $39,870, a difference of 31.0%), median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $51,473, a difference of 19.7%), and median family income ($115,847 compared to $97,288, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $52,365, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $38,528, a difference of 11.2%), and median household income ($94,846 compared to $83,395, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.4%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.61%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.7%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 69.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), male disability (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%).