Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Kuwait Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,155,755 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Immigrants from Kuwait. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 81.6 Immigrants from Kuwait.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $46,543, a difference of 12.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $98,122, a difference of 8.7%), and median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $57,562, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $64,433, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $41,055, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.4%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.80%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.5%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.0%).